Looking Beyond Greta
I do not accept Greta Thunberg. I deny her. Everything that she is, everything she stands for, I reject. Her whispered exasperation, her barely concealed fury, her weird swivel-eyes and her demented message; the whole pathetic performance is almost too cringey to watch and I will never, ever be lectured to by a silly little troll-child who is obviously the tool of demonic globalist psychopaths bent on enslaving the world under a type of eco-fascism. That I cannot abide.
It’s actually difficult to be as obnoxious as Greta. You’ve really got to strive for it, you’ve really got to want it, to hone the skills of being unlikeable and fold in more and more layers of unpalatableness. Her signature move of pouring scorn over her listeners, the whole “how dare you” routine, and, more recently, the whole “blah blah blah” angle; who exactly is that supposed to appeal to? Who do her handlers think they are talking to? Did they have a strategy meeting at some early point and actively decide that their mouthpiece’s tone should be one of withering disdain? Was it actively decided that Greta should address the world with a sneer of derision and a tenor of finger-wagging hostility? I guess so, because everything about her is contrived. She’s more of a character than a genuine personality, an agent provocateur, a useful moron who will spew out, on cue, the rivulets of bile that she has been taught to parrot.
In real life I simply do not permit anyone to scold me like that. In real life I would walk away from such an encounter, and, if prevented from leaving, things would get pretty nasty pretty quickly. No, I simply will not be spoken down to as though I am a naughty schoolboy who has been caught red-handed doing something prohibited. I am a free-born man with a sense of intellectual dignity and a healthy swipe of self-respect, so no, I will not accept Greta’s rebuke. Her clear contempt for everyone and everything that doesn’t see the world as she does is a type of childlike insanity that can burn in hell as far as I’m concerned. It’s gross, despicable, and ugly to behold; its only function is to divide people. Greta’s only function is to divide people.
Greta herself is only partially to blame, however. She is just an actress, though a very odd, very low-skilled actress. She is a tiny little human stooge engulfed in the gigantic swirling maelstrom of a culture war in full swing. She is an attack dog, a one trick pony to be trotted out when her handlers think best to do so. She carries little blame in reading her handlers’ nonsense speeches with her characteristic air of outraged moral indignation. Whenever she goes off script it becomes painfully clear that she is inarticulate and devoid of rhetorical dexterity. In reading out those stupid speeches she is just doing as she has been programmed to do. We wouldn’t blame a fox for killing all of the chickens in a roost; the fox knows no better. No, we’d blame whoever failed to correctly build the fence meant for keeping foxes out. We wouldn’t blame a wild-eyed Jack Russell for going berserk in a pen full of hamsters, rather, we would blame whoever manufactured that situation.
Let’s look beyond Greta herself. Let’s look past this very first layer of media manipulation and ask some more salient questions, for instance, where did the Thunbergs come from? What is their backstory? What do Greta’s parents think they’re doing precisely? Who are their ultimate puppet masters? Who are their managers and agents and publicists? Who controls and owns their affiliated companies? Why does a plethora of the world’s corporate media cover this particular grift so often and so thoroughly? What interests are they serving? What is their ultimate goal? What purpose does Greta serve as far as they are concerned?
We know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Greta is a mere human frontispiece for leftist globalist monsters. Her quickly deleted tweet about India is proof of that - if further proof is needed -. So the real question becomes, why are the people and organisations behind such phenomena as the Thunberg family doing what they are doing? Why are organisations like the Poetic Justice Foundation, or the Runnymede Trust, or Climate Rebellion committed to driving stakes of division through the very heart of our societies? Why are they trying to dismantle us piecemeal, one cancelling and one suicide at a time? Why? Who are they and what do they think they have to gain?
What really grinds my gears about the Thunbergs and their evil overlords, is their brazenness. That they don’t seem to care that Greta is obviously a marionette, is obviously a creature of globalist authoritarianism. They don’t seem phased or ashamed that the curtain has been drawn back to reveal a near mindless know-nothing; they just keep promoting her as though she is the font and arbiter of some absolute knowledge. It is a truly staggering display of arrogance and chutzpah on their part. May Greta, her directors, and their entire movement crumble to dust; let the grown ups continue the human project free from interference from divisive maniacs.
Comments